Clayton Plan Commission — March 30: WashU folds its Fontbonne-campus permits into one

The Plan Commission voted unanimously to recommend a single conditional use permit for Washington University's former Fontbonne campus at 6800 Wydown Boulevard, with bed-cap and dark-sky conditions.

What happened

Clayton's Plan Commission met on Monday, March 30 for a single substantive item: a request by Washington University to fold its overlapping permits for the former Fontbonne College campus at 6800 Wydown Boulevard into one consolidated conditional use permit. The university bought the campus in 2024, and the permit rolls several Fontbonne-era approvals into a single comprehensive permit for continued university use. After a detailed hearing, the Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval to the City Council — a recommendation, not the final grant, which the City Council makes.

What the Commission decided

Who was there

Chair Steve Lichtenfeld led the meeting, with members Helen DiFate, Jim Arsenault, Chris Brennan, Blair Kweskin and Jeff Morrisey present, along with Susan Buse, the board's aldermanic representative to the boards. Director of Planning and Development Anna Krane, planner Ryan Helle and City Attorney Stephanie Karr staffed the meeting.

What they debated

Staff framed the request as housekeeping rather than a change in use. The former Fontbonne campus, at Wydown and Big Bend, was purchased by Washington University in 2024, and the permit consolidates and replaces the campus's older permits while keeping its operating conditions. Two things change from the old permits: the university drops a terminated lease for 153 parking spaces on the Concordia Seminary property, while keeping 14 spaces and a connector drive on the Fontbonne site, and asks to remove a 1998 condition limiting campus enrollment to 2,200 students — a cap staff said no longer fits, because the site now operates in conjunction with the Danforth campus rather than as a standalone school.

Presenting for the university, its representative told the Commission the campus was acquired in June 2024 and that the permits are being merged into a single comprehensive permit, and that some buildings are in varied condition — a few were damaged in the tornado — with no decisions yet made about any demolition. Members' questions focused on the neighborhood impacts the board had wrestled with on earlier WashU projects. One member asked how the site would handle overflow parking for large university events such as commencement; the representative said WashU's own police would help manage traffic, and that the board's concern was the traffic, ingress and egress, and hours that neighbors are most sensitive to.

The most substantive exchange was over the bed cap. A member noted that one building WashU is assessing for possible demolition holds 124 of the 328 permitted beds, and asked that the cap be reduced by those 124 beds if that building comes down, so the permit cannot be used to shift the beds elsewhere. A member explained the reasoning: unlike the South 40 overlay district, which lets the university move beds around, this permit freezes the regulations as they are now, which the board described as a cleaner document to take to the city's zoning neighborhoods and the City Council.

In context

The vote is a recommendation, not the last word: a conditional use permit is granted by the City Council, and the Plan Commission's role is to review the request and forward a recommendation. Staff's view was that the consolidation meets the regulations governing conditional uses and would not change site conditions or create an adverse impact, and the application itself authorizes no new construction. The two member add-ons — dark-sky lighting and the bed-cap reduction tied to a possible demolition — reflect a recurring theme in the city's reviews of the university: holding density and lighting to what neighbors are used to, and keeping any future change coming back to the city for approval.

Also at the meeting

After the permit, the boards held a discussion session — no votes — on the city's 2026 comprehensive-plan objectives, covering neighborhood standards, lot sizes and setbacks, infill standards, and Planned Unit Development public benefits. Staff walked through data on lot widths, density and floor-area ratio and is expected to bring draft text amendments back to the boards in the coming weeks. The meeting adjourned at 7:16 p.m.

Public comments

The minutes record that no members of the audience elected to participate in the open forum. On the conditional use permit itself, the only non-staff speaker was the applicant's representative, who answered the Commission's questions before the vote.

Sources

  1. March 30, 2026 — Meeting Minutes
  2. March 30, 2026 — Meeting Transcript (video)
  3. March 30, 2026 — Agenda

Subscribe to Clayton Ledger

Don’t miss out on the latest issues. Sign up now to get access to the library of members-only issues.
jamie@example.com
Subscribe